Monday, October 03, 2011

RELATIVE COST OF TOILET PAPER AND DOLLAR BILLS

RELATIVE COST OF TOILET PAPER AND DOLLARS
1. TOILET PAPER
a. I COUNTED THE NUMBER OF SEPARATE SHEETS IN A ROLL
OF TOILET PAPER.
THERE ARE 300 SHEETS IN A ROLL OF T.P.
b. THERE ARE APPROXIMATELY 380 MILLION PEOPLE IN USA
380 MILLION = 380 x 10^6 PEOPLE= 380,000,000 PEOPLE
c. ASSUMING THE USE OF 10 ROLLS OF T.P. PER PERSON PER
MONTH
10 X 380x 10^6 = 3800x 10^6 ROLLS OF T.P. USED IN USA
PER MONTH PER PERSON
d. 3800 x 10^6 ROLLS x 300 SHEETS PER ROLL
= 1140,000 x 10^6 SHEETS
= 1,140,000,000,000. = 1.14 TRILLION SHEETS
d. THE STORE COST IS $3.85 FOR 9 ROLLS OF T.P.
$3.85/ 9 = $0.43 PER ROLL T.P.
e. THE TOTAL COST FOR 10 ROLLS OF T.P. FOR EVERYONE
IN AMERICA PER MONTH = 3800x 10^6 x $0.43 PER ROLL
= 1634 x 10^6 DOLLARS IN AMERICA
FOR 10 ROLLS PER PERSON PER MONTH
= 1634,000,000. = 1.634 BILLION DOLLARS FOR
1.14 TRILLION SHEETS OF T.P.
f. 1.634 BILLION DOLLARS / 1.14 TRILLION SHEETS
= 1.634 x 10^ 9 / 1.14 x 10^12 = 1.43 x 10x^-3 DOLLARS
PER SHEET OF T.P.
= 0.00143 DOLLARS TO WIPE
OUR BUTS WITH ONE SHEET
OF T.P.
g. IT COSTS EACH AMERICAN 0.00143 DOLLARS TO WIPE OUR
ASSES PER SHEET OF TP
14.6 x 10^12 DOLLARS OF DEBT / 1.14 x 10^12 SHEETS OF TP
TO WIPE OUR BUTTS FOR ONE MONTH
h. 14.6/1.14 = $12.8 DOLLARS OF DEBT TO WIPE OUT BUTTS FOR ONE MONTH.

i. THUS, IT COSTS 12.8 DOLLARS OF DEBT TO WIPE OUR ASSES WITH ONE SHEET OF TP FOR ONE MONTH

2. NATONAL DEBT
a. NATONAL DEBT = 14.6 TRILLION DOLLARS
14.6 TRILLION = 14.6 x 10^12 DOLLARS
14,600,000,000,000 DOLLARS

c. AMERICANS USE 1.14 x 10^12 SHEETS OF T.P. PER MONTH
TO WIPE OUR ASSES. THE 1.14x 10^12 SHEETS ARE WORTH
14.6 x 10^12 / 1.14 x 10^12 = 12.8 DOLLARS OF DEBT TO
WIPE OUR ASSES FOR ONE
MONTH WITH SHEETS OF
TOILET PAPER

BOTTOM LINE
d. AT THE PRESENT TIME, IT COSTS $ 0.00143 TO WIPE OUR BUTTS WITH ONE SHEET OF TOILET PAPER
e. THE NATIONAL DEBT IS SO LARGE AND WOULD MAKE THE DOLLAR SO MUCH LESS VALUABLE THAT IT WOULD TAKE 12.8 OF THE LESS VALUABLE DOLLARS TO WIPE OUR BUTTS WITH ONE SHEET OF TOILET PAPER
c. EVENTUALLY, IT WILL BE CHEAPER TO WIPE OUR BUTTS
WITH DOLLAR BILLS THAN TOILET PAPER.
d. WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT OBAMA AND THE PRESENT FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INTENDS.

e. The national debt has now been quoted as 16 trillion dollars, not 14.6 trillion. The real national debt is hidden and may be much bigger. Eventually, it will be cheaper to wipe our butts with dollar bills than TP.

Labels: ,

OBAMA WAS AN ORGANIZER BEFORE A POLITICIAN

TO: Anyone Who Needs To Know
Knowledge Is Power

Dear Sir/Madam

Barack Obama was a trained community organizer before he was a lawyer or a politician. A community organizer uses a process developed by Saul Alinsky called ALINSKY which is very foreign to a normal negotiator or even to someone who is actually negotiating in good faith. ALINSKY is the radical’s bible and is used in politics, union organizations and even local government and especially Communist organizers. An Alinskyite never makes clear what his agenda is. President Obama has not submitted a budget for many months. The reason he has not submitted a budget is that he is following the Alinsky playbook. That is an insult to all of us and shows his disdain for all of us and Congress. I am dismayed that Congress continues to allow him to continue his thumbing his nose at the Constitution, Congress and the United States of America. Not submitting a budget is part of the Alinsky playbook. Obama is waiting for Congress to develop a spending plan and appropriations to fulfill the plan and then saying NO. He is following the Alinsky bible. He has no integrity. Do you really want to allow such a man to continue to destroy us?

The following is a quote from a trained organizer named Stanley Kurtz who recognized what Obama really is and what his agenda is. Kurtz heard Obama’s important speech at the 2002 (IIRC) convention. Obama was elected because he only talks in glittering generalities and never actually states what his agenda would be or the steps he would take to achieve his agenda. This is just an extension of his policy of “voting present” instead of actually casting a vote that had some substance and could be used to evaluate the man. The Americans who voted for Obama for president were manipulated using an Alinsky process. What is the Alinsky process? The following quote by Stanley Kurtz, a National Review author plus an added comment on Alinskyism by Art Chance, also of the National Review, makes quite clear what happened in the debt debate and how Obama got what he wanted. We, the voters and members of Congress have to understand what the Alinsky tactic is before we are able to rationally vote for anything. The voting citizens are now learning what Obama really is. Supporting him is not in the future of true Americans. Unfortunately, America is infected with millions of people (illegal immigrants, terrorists, America haters, a radical media, and a Congress that appears impotent to stop him.) that are destroying the United States of America.

.
By Stanley Kurtz, National Review Author:
“Here’s my take on the puzzle of Obama’s leadership style. Obama is still every inch the Alinskyite organizer. He talks about uniting, even as he deliberately polarizes. He moves incrementally toward radical left goals, but never owns up to his ideology. Instead, he tries to work indirectly, by way of the constituencies (added-- the democrat part of the debt super committee, & the United States Senate) he seeks to manipulate.”
“Leading from behind” is classic Alinskyite strategy. The organizer finds out what the people he’s organizing want, gives them enough to gain authority and control, then slowly and quietly pushes the group in his ideological direction, all the while making it seem as though the plan is what the people (added—the super committee & the United States Senate) themselves have asked for. Obama used to literally lead from behind, by managing his group’s protests from the back of the room, while the ostensible leaders took charge on stage. That is what Alinskyite organizers do”.
“Alinskyite organizers are tough when facing down the “enemy” (their word), but subtle, stealthy, and incremental when dealing with the members of their own group. Above all, they are never openly ideological. Everything is portrayed as pragmatism”.
“The trouble with Obama’s Alinskyite leadership style is that he’s trying to adapt it to the presidency, a role it was never designed for. When he tries classic Alinskyite polarization, he treats people he’s supposed to be leading as his enemies. When he tries to bring about leftist results under the guise of a neutral pragmatism, he disappoints his base, which desperately wants him to turn his eloquence to the task of persuading the country of their principles”. (added—this is exactly what some of the liberal base is complaining about. They say that Obama is not doing what he promised to do and they do not see what the real Obama process is.)
“Obama is a bad negotiator because Alinskyite’s don’t negotiate, they intentionally polarize. (added—The democrats on the “super committee especially the woman, are all Alinskyites and you should be aware of their tactics. Is the United States Senate, an Alinskyite organization??) As for their own groups, they try to placate all factions and hide their own goals. That about describes Obama’s performance on the debt deal, which included a dollop of both of these stances”.
“I’ve laid it all out in Radical-in-Chief, from standard Alinskyite operating procedure, to Obama’s own use of it in Chicago, to the contradictions inherent in the attempt to apply these lessons to the presidency. I believe Obama is still moving according to this Alinskyite template. In his own words, it was his true political education. It’s still the key to what he’s up to.” (Added—Obama and his minions( United States Senate) are going to do the same thing. They will suggest ridiculous ideas and then wait for the Republican part of the Super Committee( or the Senate) to work among themselves to try to come up with a workable debt solution. However, the solution that will be accepted by the Democrat group( and Obama) will be one that has ruined the ability of Republicans or America to actually solve the debt problem. The Republicans are going to have to do what the House Republicans failed to do and work ONLY for a debt solution that will destroy Obama’s desired result.) The reason why the Senate has been co-opted is that it is easier to control a majority of 100 men than it is to control a majority of 435 people. The United States must return to the original Constitution’s directive to have individual State’s legislatures elect the senators of their state.
“True, Alinskyite polarization and ideological reticence were never designed for the presidency. On the other hand, I doubt a candidate that is this leftist could ever have gotten elected President without them. From Obama’s perspective, he’s already gotten more done on health care, and plenty of other issues, than any other Democrat in history. For Alinskyites, patience is all. Obama has at least an even chance of re-election. So despite the difficulties of his community-organizer techniques, he’s likely to keep to them.
The Tea Party is a difficult problem for Obama. ( The Tea Party is taking no prisoners and know what they want. The new Republican House members have not understood what is happening to them. They tried to negotiate in good faith when all the time, the Alinskyites were just waiting for the Republicans to beat themselves. That is exactly what happened. ) As David Bromwich notes, at the Huffington Post, Obama has almost never actually used the words Tea Party. The left yearns for Obama to take on the Tea Party in an overt ideological battle. But that is exactly the sort of thing Alinskyite organizers are forbidden to do. Bromwich asks why Obama has steadfastly refused to recognize the existence of the Tea Party. The answer is Saul Alinsky.
The important comment on ALINSKY by Art Chance, also of the National Review puts the results of the debt “debate” in a clear, easily understood fashion.

The following quote of the Kurtz analysis of Obama as written by Art Chance is given below.



“We few in the United States who actually practice adversarial public sector labor relations knew what Comrade Obama was the second we laid eyes on him. By "adversarial" I mean we work for a Republican government in a union state where you actually have to bargain with unions. In Democrat controlled states, the government conspires with unions against the people and the legislature”.
“When I saw him make his famous speech at the '02 (IIRC) convention I said to myself, “I know you, and you’re the one they think they can dress up and pass off as reasonable." He's a by-the-book communist/union organizer and anyone who deals with him should know Alinsky like a Baptist minister knows the New Testament”.
“Obama is almost impossible for "nice guy" Republicans to deal with. The Republicans get their ideas about negotiating from "Getting to Yes" while Obama and his ilk get theirs from "Rules for Radicals." In the debt debate, Obama didn't want a deal, he wanted a political process that could be played to his advantage, and he was very successful against the "nice guys" in getting that. Typical of an Alinskyite, he never made a concrete proposal, and made the Republicans negotiate with themselves to try to come up with something he would buy. Anyone who's ever dealt with a public employee union knows that game. If you start from the position that an agreement with them is your objective, you end up compromising yourself into their position, which is exactly what Boehner/McConnell did. Both of them are too much from the "nice guy" tradition to understand that the only way to bargain with a communist-trained negotiator is to start out with a position that if he is forced to accept it, will kill him politically or economically and make it so that the default from his not reaching an agreement is having to live under your, untenable for him, conditions. In other words, you really do have to do what the Democrats were accusing the Tea Partiers of, you hold a gun to their heads, a political or economic gun of course, and quietly say, "be reasonable so I don't have to use it."
Unfortunately, being a “nice guy” is not what needs to be done when dealing with Barack Obama or the Democrats. America desperately needs to defeat Obama, but we also need to understand what he is and many of the Democrats really are. The national media and minority voters were as fooled as anyone by Obama’s Alinsky tactics. It is time to destroy the Alinskyite Democrat Party because they do not want America to prosper. They know what they want and are waiting for the “good guys” to give it to them. The Democrat Party has become an Anti-American Party and is actively working to destroy America.

Mr. Boehner, you and the other Americans on the Super Committee have to understand what you are dealing with. Otherwise, we and America may be destroyed. Also, you may have noticed that NONE of the conservative talk radio hosts EVER talk about the effect of the Federal Reserve and the other World Central Banks (the FED is one of that group) on the debt problem. They always talk about who should be elected. The truth is the World’s Central Banks don’t care who gets elected because they (Central Banks) control the printing of currency for the nations that have allowed such a disaster to occur and therefore control enough of the election process to keep their power. The ONLY Republican candidate that understands what is happening is Rep. Ron Paul from Texas. I pray daily that he will be our next President.


p.s. Please send copies of this letter to anyone in Congress that needs to understand what they are facing.
p.p.s. Now that some of the voters understand what Obama really is, I believe that they and the Tea Party Alliance are going to have to destroy the Alinskyite United States Senate by ballot. A recent email from an organization (not Tea Party) asked if a person believes that the Government Caused Problems can be solved by ballots or bullets. You would be amazed at the number of those Americans who are willing, if necessary, to use bullets in a Second American Revolution to save the United States of America from destruction by an Alinskyite government.

Labels: , ,

Summary Of Congess Education Training

SUMMARY OF PROFESSSIONAL TRAINING
OF OBAMA ADMINISTRATION EXECUTIVE
BRANCH LEADERSHIP
Reference----Capitol Contacts, published by
Washington Times Newspaper
(L) = Lawyer
EXECUTIVE OFFICES OF THE PRESIDENT
112th Congress
1. President: Barack Obama(L), First Lady Michelle Obama(L)
2. Vice President: Joseph Biden(L)
3. Cabinet Secretary: Chris Lu
4. *Central Intelligence Agency: Leon Panetta(Office Eliminated in 112 Congress)
5. Communications Director: Dan Pfeiffer
6. White House Counsel, Bob Bauer
7. Domestic Policy Council, Melody Barnes
8. *Environmental Protection Agency, Lisa P. Jackson
9. Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships, Joshua Dubois
10. Intergovernmental Affairs, Cecilia Munoz
11. Legislative Affairs, Phil Schiliro
12. Management and Administration, Cameron Moody
13. *Management and Budget, Jacob Lew
14. Military Office, George Mulligan
15. *National Drug Control Policy, R. Gil Kerlikowske
16. National Economic Council, Gene Sperling
17. National Intelligence Director, James R. Clapper
18. National Security Adviser, Thomas Donilon
19. Political Affairs, Patrick Gaspard
20. *Council of Economic Advisors: Christine Romer
21. Presidential Personnel, Nancy D. Hogan
22. Press Secretary, Jay Carney
23. Scheduling and Advance, Alyssa Mastromonaco
24. Science and Technology Policy, John P. Holdren
25. Senior Adviser to the President, Valerie Jarrett
26. Counselor to the President: Peter M. Rouse
27. *U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., Susan Rice
28. *U.S. Trade Representative, Ronald Kirk
*= Cabinet Rank
(Note—my sources do not say which of the
Executive Offices are lead by lawyers)
=============================
OBAMA CABINET 112th Congress
15 People in Obama Cabinet,
6 Are Lawyers,
2 Are Ph.D.,
3 Are Masters of Public Administration
2 Are Education Administration
2 Are Military
0 Are Businessmen

1. Department of Agriculture (USDA): Sec. TomVilsack (L, Albany U., Attorney, 1975)
2. Department of Commerce: Sec.Gary Locke (L, Boston U., Attorney, 1975)
3. Department of Defense: Sec.Robert M. Gates(Ph.D. George Twn,Coll. Pres., USAF, 1967-69)
4. Department of Education: Sec. Arne Duncan(BS, Harvard), Education Admin.
5. Department of Energy: Sec. Steven Chu(Ph.D. Scientist)
6. Department of Health & Human Services: Sec. Kathleen
Sebelius (MPA, U. Kan.,Public Off.,1977)
7. Department of Homeland Security: Sec. Janet Naolitano (L, U.Vir.,1982)
8. Department of Housing & Urban Development: Sec. Shaun Donovan (MPA, Harvard, Housing Admin.,)
9. Department of the Interior: Secretary Ken Salazar (L,U.Mich, 1981)
10. Department of Justice: Attorney Gen. Eric H. Holder Jr.(L, Columbia, 1976)
11. Department of Labor: Hilda L. Solis (MPA, USC, 1981)
12. Department of State: Sec. Hillary Rodham Clinton(L, Yale, 1973)
13. Department of Transportation: Sec. Ray H. LaHood(BS, Educator, Bradley U., 1971)
14. Department of Treasury: Sec. Timothy Geithner (MA, Johns Hopkins, 1985, economist)
15. Department of Veterans Affairs: Sec. Eric K.
Shinseki(MA), Military Officer

U.S. SENATE LEADERSHIP
9 of 10 are Lawyers (90%)
1. President, Joe Biden, (L)
2. President Pro Tempore, Daniel Inouye, (L),
3. Majority Leader, Harry Reid, (L)
4. Majority Whip, Richard Durbin, (L),
5. Democratic Policy Comm. Chair, Charles Schumer, (L), Pub. Official, 1974)
6. Democratic Conference Chair, Harry Reid, (L),
7. Minority Leader, Mitch McConnell, (L)
8. Minority Whip, Jon Kyl, (L)
9. Republican Policy Comm. Chair, John Thune, (MBA, Assoc. Exec.1985)
10. Republican Conference Chair, Lamar Alexander, (L),

=======================================
U.S. HOUSE LEADERSHIP
112th Congress
1. Speaker, John Boehner,( BS, USN, Businessman,)
2. Majority Leader, Eric Cantor, (L)
3. Majority Whip, Kevin McCarthy, MBA, Businessman
4. Republican Policy Committee, Tom Price, Physician
5. Republican Conference Chair, Jeb Hensarling, (L),
Businessman, (1982)
6. Minority Leader, Nancy Pelosi, BA, Public Relations
Consultant
7. Minority Whip, Steny Hoyer, (L)
8. Assistant Democratic Leader, BS, Educator, 1961
9. Democratic Caucus Chair., John B. Larson, BA, 1971, Businessman,

4 Businessmen (Larson is a Democrat)
3 Lawyers (Hoyer is a Democrat)
1 Public Relations (Democrat Pelosi)
1 Physician







NUMBER OF LAWYERS IN SENATE
112 Congress
1. 55 members of the U.S. Senate are lawyers (55%)
Of the 55 lawyers in the Senate, 29 are Democrats, 26 are Republicans
==================
111 Congress
2. 57 members of the U.S. Senate were lawyers, 57%
==================
110 Congress
3. 60 members of the U.S. Senate were lawyers, 60%
==================
109 Congress
4. 58 members of the U.S. Senate were lawyers, 58%
====================
108 Congress
5. 60 members of the U.S. Senate were lawyers, 60%
==========================================
NUMBER OF LAWYERS IN HOUSE
1. 112 Congress, 152 lawyers, 152/435 = 34.9 %
2. 111 Congress 162 lawyers 162/435 = 37.2%
3. 110 Congress 165 lawyers 165/435 = 37.9%

Labels: , ,

Thursday, March 03, 2011

DAUGHTERS AND FATHERS

The letter from Girl in Need in Baltimore (December 24) who needed more time from her father is a cry for more attention from her father who is afraid to spend too much time with her. I was a member of a Divorced and Separated Catholics group for about 12 years. Most of that time I was the only male in the group and I had the chance to listen to the women’s reasons why their marriage failed. What most of the women did not realize is that nearly all men have much stronger sexual urges than they do. The strong sexual urge in the wrong situation can be extremely frightening to the man.
I once had the opportunity to talk to a lady who was having problems in her marriage. Her husband was angry because the woman was continually picking fights with him. In the course of our conversation, the lady told me that when she was young, she and her father would have boxing matches!! The boxing matches were the father’s way of “sexually safely” interacting with his daughter. The young lady learned that love and attention from her father and later from her husband required something similar to a boxing match. Her husband, of course, had no idea why his wife was continually picking fights with him. The fights were her way of gaining attention from her husband.
When a girl is very small (less than 10 years old perhaps) she and her father often are “pals” and spend a lot of time together. Sports activities are just one of the things that bring father and daughter together. Both the father and the daughter are happy with the arrangement. However, when the daughter begins to reach puberty and starts to become a woman, the father’s attention to his daughter becomes much less. It becomes much less because the father is terrified of his own feelings. Any man sees almost any woman as a beautiful person and is attracted to her. This attraction is normal and is what makes the human race grow in numbers. Such attraction between a father and his daughter is socially forbidden and rightly so. The father is terrified of his own feelings and begins to distance himself from his daughter. The daughter, of course, has absolutely no idea why her father is not as close as he once was. The daughter then somehow blames herself and her self-confidence as a woman decreases. Of course, blaming her father is not a good option because the daughter loves her father and does not want to believe that he has changed. I suspect that the lack of self-confidence that so many women have is due to the change in their father’s ability to “safely” be close to her. Eventually, the daughter finds her own man to pay more attention to her and a marriage is the result.
The same dynamic occurs in Australian aborigines. The struggle for food in the desert “outback” of Australia is so intense that only very small bands of aborigines can exist in any one place. The population-size must be kept low enough so that food for all can be found. A tribe has several distance-separated clans. Because of the small number of people in the outback desert, there is a danger of genetic reproductive errors that can produce mentally and physically damaged children. With absolutely no knowledge of genetics, the aborigines have developed a system to solve the population genetics problem. A marriage is allowed in aborigine society only between a man and a woman from different tribes. This separation minimizes the danger of genetic errors. Also, the man marries a much younger woman so that the peak reproductive years of the man and his wife are “out of sync” and result in fewer children and a smaller population. However, this system means that the newly married man and his mother-in-law are about the same age. The problem of a possible attraction of the man for his mother-in-law is avoided by the policy that any needed interaction between mother-in-law and son-in-law must be carried out without the son-in-law seeing his mother-in-law. Any necessary conversation is carried out with the son-in-law and mother-in-law speaking when they are back-to-back and do not see each other.
The father of the “Girl in Need From Baltimore” is terrified of his own feelings and is doing what the aborigines of Australia do and has removed himself from too much close contact with his daughter.

OLDERWISER

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CULTURAL AND ETHNIC DIVERSITY

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ETHNIC AND CULTURAL DIVERSITY


The United States is a product of the melting pot that takes immigrants and allows them to retain their ethnic customs and, at the same time, gives them the opportunity to be assimilated into the American Culture. I have enjoyed the wild polka dancing at a Polish Wedding, the handkerchief dance at a Jewish wedding, and the bashing of the Piñata at Mexican Christmas parties. The Irish Parade and green beer on St. Patrick’s Day, Hungarian sausages made for the holidays, the Hawaiian Hula dance and music, the music at Preservation Hall and funeral parades in New Orleans, are all ethnic customs that make the crazy quilt of American customs such a joy to experience. The variety seems endless and we are a better country for the chance to sample all the ethnic variety of our citizens. However, the ethnic variety must not be confused with cultural variety. The multitude of immigrants who bring their ethnic customs to our society, when called upon to defend the United States, even with their lives, join with their neighbors to solve a common problem or make decisions about their government are able to set aside the ethnic differences and become supporters of the American Culture that has united us all in the common goal of making the United States the best place in the world to enjoy the fruits of liberty and freedom. Nowhere else in the world does this ability exist. We must not confuse ethnic diversity with cultural diversity. They are not the same. This is not to say that American Culture is completely homogenous, it is not. The unique difference that seems not to exist in other countries, is that American citizens know the difference between ethnic and culture. The important concepts that make us a nation are common to us all. The common knowledge and acceptance of these concepts is not an accident. Schools were part of the engine that formed us into the American Culture.
The cry for diversity that we hear so often from the liberal ( i.e. socialist ) media is aimed at changing and destroying the American Culture that has made us the best country on earth.

Refer a Friend
A Time to be Thankful - To God

Thanksgiving is uniquely American. There are of course regional twists to the holiday. Ours consists of fried turkey, cornbread dressing, sweet potato crunch and my favorite - sweet potato pie. It is a time for families to gather together in prayer around the table. As you join with family and friends, take time and reflect on that first Thanksgiving. William Bradford, Governor of Plymouth, proclaimed the first official day of Thanksgiving in October of 1621. What were they thankful for? One year after arriving, the Pilgrims stood at about half their original number. Not quite one year earlier they had arrived in New England from Holland after a 66-day journey across the North Atlantic. During that first winter 47 of the 102 Pilgrims were lost to disease and starvation. If it hadn't been for Squanto, the young Patuxent Indian, the second winter might have claimed them all. Squanto had been taken captive by slave traders, but monks in Spain purchased his freedom and taught him the Christian faith. He made his way to England, learned our language, and thence returned to America. He was there to welcome the Pilgrims shortly after their arrival. Squanto taught them how to plant corn in New England's rocky soil. He shared his special knowledge of forests and rivers. Governor Bradford said Squanto had been sent by God to be the little band's Joseph.

We trace not only our Christian heritage to this brave band of Pilgrims, but also our country's solid foundation of self-government. The Mayflower Compact was signed even before the Pilgrims landed. It laid out the ideals of government by consent of the governed and made clear their purpose, "undertaken for the Glory of God, and Advancement of the Christian Faith." Plymouth Rock is the place where those Pilgrims first set foot on America's shores. The great French political scientist Alexis de Tocqueville wrote about this scene. In his classic 1835 book, Democracy in America:

This rock has become an object of veneration in the United States...Does this not show very clearly that the power and greatness of man is wholly in his soul? Here is the stone that the feet of some miserable persons touched for an instant, and this stone becomes celebrated; it attracts the regard of a great people; they venerate its remnants; they parcel out its dust in the distance. What has become of the thresholds of so many palaces? Who cares about them?

Tocqueville was one of the first Europeans to recognize the change that was taking place "in the course of human events" in America. He wrote that religious freedom was the key to understanding democracy in America. Today, there are those who think that religion and democracy are at odds with one another. Tocqueville knew that a firm foundation of faith was essential to the rise of democracy.

Family Research Council is dedicated to the defense of faith, family and freedom. Today, more than ever, that cause is grounded on the solid rock of God's grace. One final note as your family assembles on this Thanksgiving Day. Literally tens of thousands of Americans are serving our country in the U.S. military who will not be with their families. They are fighting for freedom or standing watch over our liberties. Their thanksgiving dinner may be eaten in a tent, in a tank, on board an aircraft carrier, or even in a military hospital. Let's be sure to thank God for them, especially, on this day.

LAWYERS IN CONGRESS

The Senate is 60% lawyers and has been for many years. It is no accident that the Trial Lawyers Association has warned Obama not to allow any changes in Tort Law. The need for changes in Tort Law has been discussed for many years, but nothing ever gets done and there will be no action as long as the Senate is 60% lawyers. A supermajority is 60% and can block any legislation that the lawyers want blocked. The Senate is 60% lawyers, the House is 38% lawyers and rising. The Executive branch is 100% lawyers now. Obama and the V.P. are both lawyers. Of course the Supreme Court is 100% lawyers. Therefore the lawyer culture, ( sue them till they give in) controls all three branches of government now. The bureaucracy is loaded with lawyers. Data shows that there is a lawyer for every 14 residents of Washington DC. They know where the power and money is located. We do not have government by legislation, we have government by litigation. The state of California and many other states cannot have a law passed by the electorate without having it turned upside down by the courts. Law schools produce more lawyers each year than there are those that are needed. Failed lawyers in private practice all go the Washington DC to live. The lawyer culture acts as if they deserve to have power and money, just because they are law school graduates. We need to stop electing lawyers to public office.

ROSE PARK-THE GHOST BRIGADE OF KALAMAZOO

ROSE PARK
THE GHOST BATTALION OF KALAMAZOO

The day was cloudy, damp and somber as if all nature knew that it should not intrude on the memories of the people searching the bricks. Many of the bricks had a star each side of the soldier’s’ name, telling that he had been killed in action. The sounds at Rose Park were of people slowly searching the bricks, looking for a particular name. The crowd stirred as the uniformed color guard brought the Stars and Stripes to Rose Park for the memorial ceremony to begin. A cannon roared twice and then the names of eleven hundred Kalamazoo men who gave their lives in defense of the nation were being read aloud so that we, the living, would know the price of liberty and freedom. These veterans who should not be forgotten and who knew that there are American Ideals worth dying for.
Elderly veterans read the names of the men killed in action in all the wars from the Civil to the most recent conflict. A uniformed veteran braced to attention as the names were being read and saluted as a particular name was pronounced. I believe the veteran knew the man and the sacrifice that was made so long ago. Some of the men quietly wiped their eyes, hoping that people would not notice. My uncle, standing next to me, dropped his head a bit when the name Jack Kean was read. I know the history. A day in 1942 when a Japanese machine gun, hidden in the tall kunai grass chattered, chattered again and still again and cut Jack in half. Sixty years later, my uncle still has dreams of the battles.
The street traffic sounds intruded on the solemnity of the occasion so I closed my eyes to concentrate on the names being read. After a time I noticed a cadence to the traffic sounds that began to take on the rhythm of the reading of the names. I kept my eyes closed and the cadence became the marching sounds of the Ghost Battalion of Kalamazoo. Men in Union Blue, WWI Brown, WWII Khaki, shivering from Korean cold, wet from Vietnam sweat, row on row marching past Rose Park. As each line passed, their heads snapped to the right and their eyes, wet with tears, pierced our souls to see if we really understood why they had sacrificed their lives and if we are willing to protect their gift of Liberty and Freedom

OLDERWISER

LIBERAL RAGE AND SELF HATE

LIBERAL RAGE AND SELF-HATE

All of us, at one time or another in our lives, secretly fear that a person that we have met is trying to do us some harm. Often, people try to hide that suspicion because if the fear is known, they realize that others will take that fear as evidence that there really is something to hide. That is, we fear we are not quite “normal” because others do not see the situation the same as we see it. If two people see the same situation differently, one of them must be making an error in the interpretation. Similarly, most people assume that their reaction is “normal” and that other people would react to a given situation in the same manner. This of course , is not true, but some of us cannot admit to the possibility that the one who is making an error in judgment is ourselves. The famous saying by Walt Kelly “We have met the enemy and they are us” is a succinct way of saying the same thing. Anyone who really does have something to hide, is particularly prone to the problem. Such a person does not like themselves because they have something to hide and must live forever with the fear that they will be discovered. There are two ways that we deal with this fear. One it to retreat into ourselves and meld into the background, keeping ourselves out of sight. The other is to attack, attack, attack and
hope to frighten others so they will not dare to look to see that we are hiding something. The very fact that the attacks are unreasonable is evidence that the attacker really does have something to hide. The really sad part of all this is that the attacker cannot forgive themselves for whatever it is that they are hiding. The famous book “I’m OK ,You’re OK” gives another way of dealing with the fear.

Liberals who attack, attack, attack are advertising the fact that they believe they are not quite normal. Most are miserable people who try to make sure that all others are going to be as miserable as they feel. They may have a superior education but suspect that they may not be as intelligent as they want others to believe. In their own mind, they have not succeeded as well as they think they should be capable of doing. “Those other people must be too stupid to see my superior qualities“. Many highly educated people have this problem. Sad to say, they don’t realize that the problem is really no problem at all They are unable to accept themselves as they really are. That is a sad, sad way to have to live a life. .
The Liberals accuse conservatives of having "an anger management problem." This is a classic example of Liberals projecting their own feelings onto someone else.

Quoting Michelle Malkin in Townhall:
“Like CNN executive Jonathan Klein, who derided Fox's audience as full of ‘angry white men, and those men tend to be rabid,’ and liberal comedian Bill Maher, who also railed that ‘Republicans need anger management‘ and are possessed with a ‘vein-popping, gut-churning rage that consumes the entire right wing,’ Ms. Garofalo crossly blames the Right while denying the pathological wrath and fury that characterize the unhinged Left.”
“Who are you calling angry, Ms. Garofalo? You want political road rage? Let's start with Al. Take your pick: Sharpton. Gore. Franken.” Now, open your eyes: It isn't out-of-control conservatives …. smearing pig's blood and feces on the walls and windows of military recruitment centers across the country to protest on behalf of peace.
It isn't rage-blinded conservative professors who embrace fragging (the murder of American soldiers by their fellow soldiers on the battlefield) as a legitimate anti-war tactic.
It isn't vengeful conservatives torching SUVs, condo developments, and research facilities, and targeting biotech and pharmaceutical company employees and their families to protest on behalf of the environment.
It wasn't mad conservatives sporting "F--- Bush" license plates, punching cardboard cutouts of the president, and vowing to secede after losing the 2004 presidential election.
It wasn't rabid conservatives who gloated over Ronald Reagan's death or John Ashcroft's pancreatitis.
It wasn't a gut-busting conservative journalist who vowed to kill herself if Dick Cheney ran for president. (That would be the perpetually aggrieved Helen Thomas.)
It wasn't hate-filled Republican officials who reportedly screamed "faggot" and "fruitcake" and "I'll break your nose" at their political opponents. (Those were all Democrats: Pennsylvania state legislator Vincent Fumo, California Rep. Pete Stark, and Virginia Rep. Jim Moran, respectively.)
It isn't fanatical conservatives joking about the assassination of President Bush and the execution of his Republican aides. (That, Ms. Garofalo, would include your Air America colleagues. But I'll forgive you if you weren't tuned in to them. Few are.)
And it wasn't ruthless conservatives who cheered last week when a liberal Bush-hater wrote on the popular DemocraticUnderground.com website last week:
I am an American, Born and Raised, but I am NOT a citizen of BUSH'S America. I want nothing to do with the country these people have created.
And for those who support them, Let's get Something Nice And Sparkling CLEAR:
Stay The [F---] Away From Me. Stay OUT of my personal space. I want NOTHING from you. I want NOTHING to do with you. I want NOTHING to do with your "vision" of what the world should be.
What DO I want from you?
Honestly?
I will freely admit there are days, and they are becoming more than not, that the Alien at Area 51 in Independence Day and I share quite a common ground on the answer to that question.
And I am NOT apologizing for it.
In the words of the Late, Great Bill Hicks, about the most conciliatory thing I can say for those people at this point is simply this:
Kill Yourself’ “
The Liberals are unable to live up to their own expectations and are trying to make sure the rest of us are just as miserable as they are.

OLDERWISER

THE KALAMAZOO STUTTERS COUNCIL

The Kalamazoo Stutters Council
January 12, 2009
Subject: The Kalamazoo Stutterers Council
This is a true story. I was there when it happened.
I am a stutterer and there was a time in my life when I had trouble saying my own name. The Gazette’s recent articles on stuttering brought to mind one of the efforts by Kalamazoo stutterers to help the students in the Van Riper Speech Pathology Department. The students were not stutterers, they were only learning how to help stutterers deal with their problem. A WMU student who stuttered, [not in Speech Pathology] had the idea of making an organization of stutterers available to the students so that their speech pathology training could be more realistic by working with real stutterers. The effort was made in the late 1970’s to organize the Kalamazoo Stutterers Council. A notice was published to invite those who stuttered to meet at a home on Knollwood St. to organize the Kalamazoo Stutterers Council. The organization meeting was held in a large front room with about 25 or 30 stutterers on chairs placed along the walls of the room. The meeting began by attempting to state the purpose of the Kalamazoo Stutterers Council. When a person who stutters is in a group of stutterers, the problem becomes much worse because self-consciousness takes over and stuttering increases immensely. After less than hour, the organization effort failed while the stuttering became much worse. The meeting did not achieve its goals. It was the last time the Kalamazoo Stutterers Council ever met. It’s important to have a sense of humor.

There Are Two Kinds of Unions

TWO KINDS OF UNIONS

There are two kinds of unions. A union works for a private company that is
owned by a private person. The owner and the union representative proceed to
negotiate. The union and the owner agree on the employee’s salaries and
other compensation, and a contract is signed. The owner is able
(because he is at the bargaining table) to control how much of the companies’
profit he is able to share with the employees and still have enough left to maintain
his business. If the owner continues to give so much of the company’s revenue that
his business cannot pay its bills, the company fails and there is no company, no profit and
no jobs for the employees. The owner may decide to move the business to a place where his decisions and agreements with the employees’ union do not endanger the company, the employee’s jobs or the
ability to make a profit and stay in business. The owner has the right and the power to make these decisions
because he owns the business.
The second type of union is where both sides do not have any need to worry about
profits or the future health of the company. An example of the second type of union is
the SCME (State,County,Municipal Employee) union. Both parties, the union and state
representative decide how much the tax payers are going to have to pay to keep
government functioning and also how much the government employees are going
to be paid. However, there is no one at the negotiation table that represents the tax payers.
The first statement from many readers, union members and politicians is going to be
that the politician is the tax payers’ representative. There is no consequence
for the politician or the union if the employee’s salaries and benefits are much
more than the taxpayer is willing or can afford to pay for the jobs in question.
The result is that the cost of government at all levels (including the Federal) keeps
going up and we wonder why we, the tax payers, are struggling to pay our bills
and are paid so much less than the bureaucracy.
There is a video clip on the internet showing the head of the National Education
Association union saying to the union members that the purpose of the union is
not education, it is the power to elect politicians who will take the union’s dues
money and vote in Congress the way the union wants him to. The power of the
union is based on the union member’s dues money that is kicked back from
the union to the politician in return for the special interest legislation that the
union wants. The tax payer has no seat at the table and no chance to say how
much or where his taxes are spent in support of unions and union leaders.
The fight in Wisconsin over the size and cost of government employees is exactly
the result of the taxpayer not having a seat at the negotiation table and the greed
of both the politician and the union. The tax payer is at the mercy of the politician
who believes his job is more important than good government. The government
employees know that their bloated salaries are the direct result of using tax money
to pay politicians to pass legislation to keep the power of the union intact.
Some one who has access to the Excel spread sheet that is used by the Wisconsin
school teacher’s union (National Education Association union) has posted the
salaries of teachers, staff, bus drivers and garbage municipal garbage haulers for all to
see. The garbage men make between $70,000 and $159,000 per year plus benefits!
There will be some who question the accuracy of the Wisconsin data, but the fact
remains that the cost of state government in Wisconsin (and Michigan) is set by
politicians and unions, without the presence of the tax paying public at the
negotiating table.
Wisconsin’s governor is trying to do something about the greed and power of
unions and politicians. It is clear who in government is pleasing the
special interests when the all the Wisconsin democrats left the state and refuse to
do the job they were elected to do. We need to get the Michigan data that tells
us the government employee’s wages. How much of the wages and union dues
end up in the election campaigns of politicians?
The taxpayers need to have at least one representative at the bargaining table to
be sure that the contract does not have salaries and benefits that are too high for
the job in question and that the employee’s compensation is adequate but is
not so high that the union is able to kick back union dues to the politician’s election
campaign. A union is for the benefit of the employee’s salary and benefits,
not for the union to influence who gets elected. Any politician who takes union
money should not be elected.

Wednesday, February 04, 2009

All European Life Died At Auschwitz--American Life Died In The Womb

ALL EUROPEAN LIFE DIED IN AUSCHWITZ--- AMERICAN LIFE DIED IN THE WOMB

“The following is a copy of an article written by Spanish writer Sebastian Vilar Rodrigez and published in a Spanish newspaper on 5-22-07. It doesn't take much imagination to extrapolate the message to the rest of Europe - and possibly to the rest of the world. It was published in a Spanish newspaper on Tuesday, 22 May 2007. The time of the original Internet notice was 14:30:20. Keep in mind that this was written by a Spanish writer about Spain and Europe.”
Regards, “Thomas”

“ALL EUROPEAN LIFE DIED IN AUSCHWITZ”
By Sebastian Vilar Rodrigez (*)
I walked down the street in Barcelona, and suddenly discovered a terrible truth - Europe died in Auschwitz. We killed six million Jews and replaced them with 20 million Muslims. In Auschwitz we burned a culture, thought, creativity, talent. We destroyed the chosen people, truly chosen, because they produced great and wonderful scientists, musicians, and lovers of life, people who changed the world.
The contributions of these people is felt in all areas of life: science, art, international trade, and above all, as the conscience of the world. These are the people we burned. And now, under the pretense of tolerance, and because we wanted to prove to ourselves that we were cured of the disease of racism, we opened our gates to 20 million Muslims. These Muslims brought us social ignorance, religious extremism and lack of tolerance, crime and poverty, due to an unwillingness to work and live with pride.
They have turned our beautiful Spanish cities into the third world, drowning in filth and crime. Shut up in the apartments they receive free from the government, they plan the murder and destruction of their naive hosts. And thus, in our misery, we have exchanged culture for fanatical hatred, creative skill for destructive skill, intelligence for backwardness and superstition.
We have exchanged the pursuit of peace by the Jews of Europe and their talent for hoping for a better future for their children. We traded determined clinging to life because life is holy, for those who pursue death. We traded for a people consumed by the desire for death for themselves and others, for our children and theirs. What a terrible mistake was made by miserable Europe.”
“A lot of Americans have become so insulated from reality that they imagine America can suffer defeat without any inconvenience to themselves.”

*This is a translation of an article from a Spanish newspaper.
***************************************************************************
The above essay suggests not only the European mistake made in the Holocaust, but it may also explain the willingness of Islamists to become suicidal terrorists. Islam is a culture of death and revenge. Islamist radicals are murdering their own people who are moderates.
The price being paid by Europe for the Holocaust is steep, but there may be a parallel example in the United States. We Americans, in the name of convenience and mental health, have murdered 40 million unborn Americans. The 40 million would more than replace the work force missing from our economy. We are paying a price. We are paying the price of abortion advocated, approved and adopted by ourselves and our government. We, and Global Business, are replacing the missing Americans with illegal aliens who are turning America into a copy of the failed Mexican government and onto a path that may lead to Islamist Sharia law and the destruction of America’s Judeo/Christian heritage. American voters can change this course if we have the will and resolve. Our children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren will have to live with our mistakes.

Abortion Leads America Down Slippery Slope
Christians protest the killing of the unborn but complain that they are powerless to stop it. Politicians view re-election at any cost as a valid excuse to take the easy way. Lawyers believe if something is legal it is also ethical, and those who make a living running abortion clinics are all arrayed against anyone who trys to stop the culture of death that is becoming acceptable to Americans. The “God is Dead” crowd and the celebrated Harvard University professor who sees no wrong in killing a baby up to a month after birth is with us now. The world has been on a slippery slope accepting death for a very long time. America prides itself on being a better place to live but we are on the same slippery slope.
The slope is insidious and the path to final destruction is incremental and often not noticed until murder is accepted as normal. Nazi Germany began with collection of the weak and elderly for health reasons. The families and church wondered where they went but did nothing. The senile and disabled were next to be collected. The families were told that the state was helping to make life easier and less of a burden to others. Eventually, epileptics, even bed-wetters and those without Aryan features were rounded up and “taken care of.” Finally, Jews, Poles, Russians, and troublesome Christian clerics were all sent to the gas chambers. After the war the world wondered how such an atrocity could occur in a Christian nation.
In 1959, Congress passed a law making it legal to abort babies in cases of rape and incest or only if the mother’s physical health was in danger. We had stepped onto the slippery slope. In 1967, our government leaders passed a law that made abortion of mental or physically defective fetuses legal. They were doing Americans a favor by removing a family’s mental anguish and embarrassment. The emotional health of mother or family in 1971, became reason enough to abort a fetus. By this time, the abortion industry realized the huge amounts of money that could be made in abortion clinics. 1973 saw the Supreme Court decision in Roe vs. Wade to make abortion legal for any reason desired. An excuse wasn’t needed any more. Any reason would do. Partial birth abortion was made legal in 1997 when President Clinton’ veto was not overturned. Most of the country tsk-tsked but nothing was done. We have not seen the end yet.
Some of the Christian churches make efforts to end the American culture of death but there are powerful forces arrayed against them that are using the same incremental destruction of conscience that worked so well in Nazi Germany. The creeping destruction of our conscience by the American Civil Liberties union is a call to action. Abortion on demand, legalization of pornography, removal of “God Bless America” from our lips, and the numbing of our sense of right and wrong is just another series of steps on the slippery slope. We are far down the slippery slope now and America was never in more danger.

AMERICAN LIBERALS KEEP
TRYING TO “FIX” THEIR CONSCIENCE

Just as the Europeans keep trying to convince themselves that they are shed of their Holocaust guilt, American Liberals keep trying to convince themselves and everyone else, that WWII, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Vietnam, Grenada, Afghanistan, Iraq,, you name it, must be dealt with over and over and over until America has suffered so much that their conscience is satisfied. Just as Europe, American Liberals are willing to destroy America of the present to convince themselves that they are better. When any government or people keep wringing their hands about history, they will eventually destroy their country and themselves. Liberals always try to raise their opinioin of themselves by sending the rest of the country on guilt trips. History is a tool that they use but never care if the their social disruption destroys the country that allows them to manufacture guilt trips. They try to tell themselves that they are somehow better than anyone else. Anyone who feels the need to do this is implicitly stating that they don’t really like themselves and have not achieved what they think they should. That is a mental disturbance that cannot be fixed. The never ending effort to put history on trial is a sign of a mental and social disorder. They don’t know how and don’t want to forgive themselves for being an American. That is a mental disorder. The refusal to consider enforcing our immigration laws and advocating "open borders" is just another aspect of the same mental disorder. You cannot improve the present by keeping trying to "fix history". There are at least two American groups that suffer from this mental disorder. The mission of lawyers and the media too often is to "same America from itself" That is a fool's mission.


Older Wiser

Monday, February 02, 2009

The Kalamazoo Stutters Council

January 12, 2009
Subject: The Kalamazoo Stutterers Council
This is a true story. I was there when it happened.
I am a stutterer and there was a time in my life when I had trouble saying my own name. The Gazette’s recent articles on stuttering brought to mind one of the efforts by Kalamazoo stutterers to help the students in the Van Riper Speech Pathology Department. The students were not stutterers, they were only learning how to help stutterers deal with their problem. A WMU student who stuttered, [not in Speech Pathology] had the idea of making an organization of stutterers available to the students so that their speech pathology training could be more realistic by working with real stutterers. The effort was made in the late 1970’s to organize the Kalamazoo Stutterers Council. A notice was published to invite those who stuttered to meet at a home on Knollwood St. to organize the Kalamazoo Stutterers Council. The organization meeting was held in a large front room with about 25 or 30 stutterers on chairs placed along the walls of the room. The meeting began by attempting to state the purpose of the Kalamazoo Stutterers Council. When a person who stutters is in a group of stutterers, the problem becomes much worse because self-consciousness takes over and stuttering increases immensely. After less than hour, the organization effort failed while the stuttering became much worse. The meeting did not achieve its goals. It was the last time the Kalamazoo Stutterers Council ever met. It’s important to have a sense of humor.
Older Wiser

Labels:

Friday, August 08, 2008

Government Gives Us Nothing; They Have Nothing To Give

Our Government Gives Us Nothing
They Have Nothing to Give

We are told by those who would believe we are capable or giving ourselves Liberty and Freedom, that we are the ones who will frame a newer, better America through the force of our own will and our own goodness. This is not what the Founders thought. They knew that each one of us could be corrupted by power. "If men were angels," wrote Thomas Jefferson's young friend, James Madison, "no government would be necessary." With proper checks and balances, the Founders were willing to trust the American people more than they trusted kings and lords on earth. That trust is being sorely tried in this age of legislation by litigation. Litigation by those who believe that their brand of law is better than what the Founders told us we already have.

In declaring our own independence, we were doing more than breaking away from Europe. We were breaking away from tyranny. We were breaking away from the idea that some men were fit to govern others without their consent. We broke the chains of dependency and servitude. Those chains of dependency and servitude are being forged again by a Congress who hides their activities from us. By a media who have not the will to tell us when we are being lied to and an electorate who believes only government is capable of “giving” us Freedom and Liberty.

The Declaration of Independence celebrated each July 4th inspired Abraham
Lincoln and Frederick Douglass to end slavery. It inspired Americans of
the World War II generation to stand up against Nazi cruelty. It motivated
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. to fight against segregation. In one hand, Dr.
King held the Declaration. In the other, he held the Bible. “Let justice roll
on like a river and righteousness like a never failing stream," he said in the
prophetic words of Amos.

We need not separate our dedication to the Declaration of Independence from our devotion to God's Word. The atheists of today would have us believe that there is a conflict between our God and our country. It is not so.
When the President signs the July 4th Proclamation tomorrow, he will conclude with these words: "In the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-third." These words are a powerful acknowledgment that our liberties, our independence, and our very life as a people are dependent upon the power and might of God the Lord. They are NOT the gift of government.

Medical Marijuana Is Not Good Idea

Medical Marijuana

Marijuana contains impurities, chemicals, besides tetrahydocannibinol (THC). The impurities (crap) are inhaled along with the active THC. This is little different from the crap inhaled when smoking tobacco. The inhaled impurities from marijuana dissolve in the body fat and are stored there. The impurities from a single smoked joint can be detected in the blood even after a week. Upjohn saw this when screening clinical volunteers. The storage of the crap from marijuana is cumulative because it stays in the body fat and accumulates to very large amounts. The impurities are hidden in the fat and not easily detected and that is why marijuana seems to have no ill effects at first. Eventually the amount of crap in fat leaks into the blood and then memory loss, sexual function, liver enzyme levels all change. If THC relieves pain then use the THC and stop poisoning the body with the crap. Marinol, which is THC without the crap is available and should be used instead of smoking weed.
The accumulation of the “crap’ in body fat is slow because there is not much in a single joint. But, after many joints, the crap gets into the body fat, it can take years for the slow process of metabolism and elimination to rid the body of the crap. It is the long term side-effects of marijuana that are a medical hazard and since the federal law requires all approved medications to be both safe and effective the present law will forbid the use of marijuana. The law forbidding use of marijuana is independent of any moral or ethical concerns as voiced by some politicians. Medical experts know the dangers of smoking weed while the ignorant politicians and public need to be educated to the real dangers of smoking marijuana. Smoking tobacco has many of the same dangers but none of the virtues of THC.

Labels: ,

Effect Of Separation Of American Jobs From American Market

Effect of Separation of American Jobs
From the American Market

When American Capitalists such as Henry Ford, Andrew Carnegie and others founded their businesses, the jobs they created were in the same location as the market that the products of the jobs were meant to be sold. The jobs and wealth created by expansion of business and the wealth of the workers that their jobs created were all located in the same market. That is, the financial opportunities for business were located in the same society as the jobs and the market opportunities. This is why Capitalism creates wealth that did not previously exist, not only for the business owner but also for the workers who make the products to be sold. The location of the market must be in the same society as the workers who produce the products and earn the money to buy the products. When the market is separated from the market-located jobs, the market will eventually disappear. The buyers of products are the makers of markets and without jobs the workers haven’t the money to buy and so the market shrinks and eventually the market might disappear. This decreasing market scenario is happening now with China and the European Common Market. American politicians are not doing enough retain a prosperous society. Instead they are allowing us to sink back into what existed before industrialists created the wealth of American society with jobs.
This situation is exactly what our government is destroying! Our federal government is actively separating business interests in America and the related American jobs from the American consumer market. The jobs are going to foreign countries but the market remains in America [temporarily]. Our politicians do not understand that free markets only work to the benefit of both business owners and workers when the jobs and the market are in the same society. In reality, politicians do understand this but have opted to bow to Global Business instead of bowing to the loyal American industrialists, and the jobs that choose to stay in America.
A market is an extremely valuable resource. Our government is selling the American market to global business interests who have gained appreciable control of American politics. The Bilderberg Group is a case in point.[Go to Google and type in the word Bilderberg and see the response]
The necessiity of making jobs and market be in the same society is what drives politicians to pass laws making tariffs on imported products a necessary condition for access to the country’s market. The purpose is to protect the jobs and thus the market and living standard for the citizens. This is often counter-productive because other societies retaliate by passing tariffs on products made in the politician’s country. This tit-for-tat policy slowly diminishes the size of the valuable markets in both countries. America has refrained from using tariffs to control the loss of jobs but other countries have not reciprocated. China uses regulations and dense, slow, capricious decision paperwork to achieve the same effect as monetary tariffs to control access to the huge Chinese market. Thus China can say we have no tariffs, but the control of imports is still there.
Carl Levin and his refusal to stop illegal immigration, build a wall, keep American jobs for Americans, etc. is actively destroying the American market and the American standard of living. His refusal to support drilling for oil has made Americans unable to travel as they used to. This represents a shrinking of the American market. It is only one example of many. His actions cause corporations to move to low labor cost countries. Levin’s political dependence on Big Labor Unions has resulted in the continuing destruction of American jobs, the American market and the standard of living. The kinds of jobs that are left are not the kind that many loyal Americans are able to fill without specialized education. Keep the electorate uninformed and they can be lead to accept anything.
What do we do if tariffs do not work or if Global Business chooses to move jobs to other low wage countries? What options do we have to keep American jobs inside the American market? There are some things that can be done. Toyota is one example of a corporation that brings the jobs to the market instead of separating worker’s jobs from the market. States that have Right-to-Work laws have received the great majority of jobs such as those provided by Toyota. Michigan and America need a right-to-work law. Require the jobs, the shipping, the transportation and all aspects of foreign business to keep the jobs in America. It won’t be easy, but nothing worth doing is ever easy. NAFTA is the federal government’s effort to separate jobs from the market, all for the benefit of Global Business and deny any benefit to American citizens.
I believe that showing the voters that you understand the dynamics of the loss of jobs and what might be done to correct the problem will gain some votes in November. Government control and taxing will not solve the problems that American business faces. Less paperwork, less government, less bureaucracy, fewer obstacles to jobs are needed. Any Michigan federal senator must have these as requirements for being elected. America has a lot of power over Asia. All we have to do is stop buying anything that is made in China, India or anywhere else in Asia. That is why the Chinese, Japanese and Indian economies have an instant problem when ever America stops buying or even slows down buying products from any of the three countries. We only need the will to do what is needed. We can stop their destruction of American jobs by stopping buying their products. It is our market they want, not our jobs. Canada is a socialist country that history has shown does not work. The Liberals keep changing the name from Communism, to Liberal to Progressive, etc. but they are all the same. The government and bureaucrats think they can make better decisions than the folks who are actually buying and thus forming the market. History has shown since the middle 1800's that government is too stupid to make such broad decisions. The same goes for laws. No law fits all cases and they don't care. More laws means more opportunities to sue, arrest, and stop anything that the bureaucrats don't like.
Older Wiser

Labels: , ,

The Church Cannot Usurp The Responsibilities of Government

The Church Cannot Usurp The Responsibilties Of Government

When Christ said “Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s and to God the things that are God’s”, it was not only a coin that belonged to Caesar. Caesar and any government have the responsibility to administer the civil affairs of any society. Christ explicitly said that what belongs to government must be rendered to government. The Catholic Church does not have the moral, ethical or expertise to appropriate the responsibility to administer American government. Christ recognized that all things related to secular, ethical government are not the responsibility of the Catholic [Christian or a non-Christian] Church. Centuries past, when the Church did in fact, involve itself in government, the scandals were legion, and the hierarchy was corrupted by money, secular, political power and eventually wisely stopped interference in the responsibilities of government. Cardinal Richelieu is a famous example of church interference in government.
The laws of a nation and their administration are not the responsibility of any church. When the bishops of Los Angeles defied the immigration laws and encouraged illegal immigration by sheltering the illegal,law-breaking immigrants, they were not rendering to government the responsibilities of American government. The bishops were usurping the explicit responsibility of American government and spreading scandal by showing contempt for the law.
Concern for immigrants is a laudable goal that can be achieved without breaking the law or usurping governmental responsibility. The slow step in admitting new, legal, immigrants is the poor efficiency of the Immigration and Naturalization Service in processing the immigration applications of people who want to become Americans. The job of the immigration service is not to admit just anyone!. Their responsibility is to protect the legal, ethical sovereignty and borders of America. The church actions would be better served by doing what they can to ethically expedite immigration applications. It is also not the legal or ethical right of the church to change American society to suit any hierarchical desires.
The very best action that any church can do is to criticize and condemn the famously corrupt Mexican government to change the treatment of Mexican citizens. The real problem is the lack of opportunity in Mexico, not the legally constituted government policies of America.
The Catholic Church learned centuries ago that interference in secular government is not part of their mission. It is unfortunate that the lesson needs to be learned again. The source of the problem resides in Mexico, not in America. Abe Lincoln said, "You cannot make the poor rich by making the rich poor". It is NOT redistribution of wealth that is needed. It is the redistribution of the OPPORTUNITY for indvidual action and individual responsibility. Liberal, tyrannical governments always try to control not only the wealth but also the opportunity for a better life. Liberals have a mental disorder that says, "I and my superior intellect and educaton empower me to control anyone who has less intellect and education". This attitude of Liberals has been the source of failure of scores of governments and organizations in history. The Founding Fathers wrote two documents that are the basis of Amereican society. The Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution. The Declaration of Independence gives the moral, ethical basis for American self-government. It also states the fact that the rights of man come from a Creator and NOT from a government. The United States Constitution, although the word "God" does not appear anywhere in the document, gives the recipe, the working methods, that are to be used to fulfill the truths stated in the Declaration of Independence. The Constitution cannot be changed when it disagrees with the Declaration of Independence. Both Church, Morality,and an Ethical Road Map and also Government are needed to fulfill the American Republic. Thus we need BOTH moral,ethical guidelines and e need a government. We CANNOT have one without the other. The effort to remove God and religion from American government is just a foolish attempt to do what the Founding Fathers wisely said cannot be done and still have a nation. Government without moral and ethical guidelines is tyranny and church,religion without government is chaos. We need both and in their proper places with separate responsibilities. Liberals who believe they can do both functions are foolish and will distroy not only America but also themselves. When will they ever learn?
Older Wiser

Labels: ,

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

Who Is Making All The Profits Selling Gasoline

SUBJECT: Who Is Making All The Money Selling Oil

In June, 2006 a report on the distribution of costs and profits in various parts of the petroleum industry was published in Scientific American. The report was extracted by the author from data given by Harold Schobert, professor of fuel science and director of the Energy Institute of Pennsylvania State University.
Half of all crude oil is converted into gasoline. There have been no new refineries built in the United States for over 30 years. This is so because of three reasons. The first reason is that environmental permit requirements are so filled with bureaucratic hurdles that the time and cost necessary to build the refineries is too much to justify the investment. The second reason is that there are not very many places in the Unites States that the local governments wish to have a refinery in their back yard. The surviving refineries have expanded to try to fulfill the market demand but the oil industry is running above 90% of refining capacity. We were told that when hurricane Katrina hit, the refineries were damaged and production was diminished. Because there is essentially no excess refining capacity available as a back-up, the supply of gasoline is reduced and the pump price goes up. You may ask, why not force the oil refineries to keep the prices as they were before the loss of refining capacity. That assumption misses the point. If there is not enough gasoline to satisfy everyone’s demands then some people will be willing to pay more for the gasoline that is available just to satisfy their needs. “ I need that gasoline now and I will pay you more than this other guy because that is the only way I can get to work, keep in business, or make a living. The price of any commodity is driven by demand versus supply. It is never driven by some bureaucrats idea of a “fair” price. Our government leaders talk about excess profits tax to punish the refineries for making too much money at the expense of the public needs. The tax goes into the public coffers and does absolutely nothing to increase the supply of gasoline which is the root of the problem. This is like the child who drops his ice cream to the ground so he knocks ice cream off his buddy’s cone so they are equally without any ice cream. This is known as mutual misery.
The third reason for high gasoline prices is the lack of profit to the companies that make the gasoline. The United States Energy Information Administration has published the distribution of costs and profits for a dollars worth of gasoline at the pump. The costs are as follows:

Refining: 18 cents
Cost of Crude Oil 47 cents
Taxes 23 cents
Distribution and Retail Dealers 12 cents
----------------
100 cents
Schobert’s report showed that the profit at the refinery step is only a few cents per gallon.
It is exceedingly low profits and public resistance to building refineries that give little incentive for companies to spend the $2 billion dollars needed to build a new refinery. It is no surprise that the second biggest cost of making gasoline is the tax burden placed on the companies. Government is second only to the OPEC cartel as the reason why the price of gasoline is so high and the supply is so limited. Why am I not surprised??
The only solution that makes any sense is to find another energy source that is not dependent on OPEC manipulation of the supply and price of crude oil. Before 1970, the price of crude oil was about $10 per barrel. The present price is in the $65 per barrel range. The difference represents the difference between present gasoline at about $2.40 a gallon versus a price of about 37 cents a gallon!! Conservation of gasoline is often touted as a solution to the problem. If we use less gasoline and hence less crude oil, there will be more available and the price will drop. However, conservation is just another form of mutual misery. “If I can’t get the gasoline I need then you can’t get it either“. Children!!!! Making ethanol from corn is not a solution either. Over 85% of total corn production would be needed to make ethanol that still would not bring the price down to acceptable levels. Only the conversion of cellulose to ethanol will give the volume of ethanol that will truly make a satisfactory difference in the price of gasoline.
Moreover, the money that is going to the OPEC countries for their crude oil is being used to finance the Islamic Imperialist attacks around the world. It is no accident that the rise in the price of crude oil and the first attacks by Islamic fanatics occurred at the same time.
The petroleum companies are making huge profits in spite of the huge cost of crude oil and the small profit margin making gasoline. The reason for the huge profits is not because they are charging more for their product than is ethically reasonable. The reason for the huge profits is the fact that there are only five or six refineries left in the whole United States. Kalamazoo used to have the Lakeside Refinery on Cork St. but it went out of business when the price of crude oil made it impossible to make any profit. There are no refineries left in Michigan and the same is true for all states except those that have nearby sources of crude oil or are located where oil tankers can unload directly into the refineries. The result of only a few existing refineries left, is that the profit that is available is concentrated in those refineries that are still able to stay in business. The United States must have sufficient gasoline, even at high prices, to keep the economy going.
Taxing the oil companies with the excuse that they are making “excess profits” only gives government more money to spend for reelection and does nothing to increase the supply of gasoline or make the price of crude oil more reasonable. The result of an “excess profits tax” is that the consumer must pay more for the gasoline that is available and thus has less for living expenses. This is just another example of the childish “mutual misery” social dynamic. If I am hurting, then you have to hurt too.!!!
The petroleum companies are making huge profits in spite of the huge cost of crude oil and the small profit margin making gasoline. The reason for the huge profits is not because they are charging more for their product than is ethically reasonable. The reason for the huge profits is the fact that there are only five or six refineries left in the whole United States. Kalamazoo used to have the Lakeside Refinery on Cork St. but it went out of business when the price of crude oil made it impossible to make any profit. There are no refineries left in Michigan and the same is true for all states except those that have nearby sources of crude oil or are located where oil tankers can unload directly into the refineries. The result of only a few existing refineries left, is that the profit that is available is concentrated in those refineries that are still able to stay in business. When many smaller refineries were still in business, the existing profits were distributed instead of concentrated. The United States must have sufficient gasoline, even at high prices, to keep the economy going.
Taxing the oil companies with the excuse that they are making “excess profits” only gives government more money to spend for reelection and does nothing to increase the supply of gasoline or make the price of crude oil more reasonable. It was career politicians who passed previous “excess profits taxes” The result of an “excess profits tax” is that the consumer must pay more for the gasoline that is available and thus has less for living expenses. This is just another example of the childish “mutual misery” social dynamic that politicians and government in general use to try and justify raising taxes. The politicians believe that we are so stupid that we never understand or object to the “If I am hurting, then you have to hurt too“ policy that they use to try and justify raising taxes. Voters are not as stupid as our government and social experimenters would like to believe.
If government and global business were really ready to find other sources of energy besides oil, they would have encouraged and helped the effort a long time ago.
Reference: Scientific American, June 2006, pg. 88-89

Wednesday, October 25, 2006

What If The Hiroshima & Nagasaki Bombs Not Dropped

WHAT WOULD HAVE HAPPENED IF THE ATOM BOMBS HAD NOT
BEEN DROPPED ON HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI
War is ugly but it is not the ugliest. Far uglier is the sixty years of criticism, complaints, and condemnation by self-righteous, ignorant people who never ask the question: What would have happened in WWII if the bombs had not been dropped. The answer to that question has been known for a very long time.
The plans for the American invasion of the Japanese home islands in WWII still exist and have been available for many years to anyone who asks the question. There were 420 thousand American soldiers killed in WWII. How many more Americans and Japanese would have been killed if the invasion of Japan had been carried out? How much longer would WWII have continued before the Japanese surrendered? Who, in Japan, could make the decision to stop the war? How many of the fools who condemn the decision to drop the bombs would not exist because their fathers, grandfathers would have been killed in the invasion of Japan?
For sixty years the second-guessers, America last , agenda driven, holier than thou ignorant moralists have never asked the question “what would have happened if the atomic bombs had not been dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.” The United States’ plans for the invasion of the Japanese home islands still exist as do the Japanese plans for the defense of the expected invasion of their home islands by the allied powers in 1945. The invasion was to begin on the island of Kyushu in November 1945 and the invasion of Honshu at Tokyo in the Spring of 1946. The United States’ expectation was that the war would continue for at least another two years. The reality is that the probability of a much longer war was very high. The truth of the matter has been known since at least 1999 and the data was available for more than twenty years before that. The national WWII monument in Washington shows that 420,000 American soldiers were killed in action in that war. If the atom bombs had not been dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the total dead would have been more than doubled. Read the book.
Those pacifists who believe they have the moral high-ground and criticize, complain and condemn dropping the atom bombs that ended the WWII could not be more wrong. There are two kinds of pacifists. Albert Einstein, who asked President Roosevelt to start the development of the atom bomb, was a pacifist who said in 1931 at Cal. Tech. “ I am not only a pacifist but a militant pacifist. I am willing to fight for peace….Is it not better for a man to die for a cause in which he believes, such as peace, than to suffer for a cause in which he does not believe“? Nazi Germany needed to be stopped in order to return the world to peace. Einstein thus asked Roosevelt to start the development of the atomic bomb because the Nazis were developing the bomb and were ahead of the United States at the time. The American military has always gone to war to return peace, not to become an imperialist country such as Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan and now, imperialist Islam. The other type of pacifist, the one with the signs, believes that doing nothing to keep their liberty, freedom and peace will shame the enemy into stopping their aggression. History shows that they are wrong. They will lose their Liberty, Freedom and Peace by doing nothing. Their actions produce the exact opposite of what they profess to want. The Communist International, Nazi Germany and now Islamic Imperialists rely on the second type of pacifist to do nothing and thus make possible the victory of the aggressors. Many of those today, who enjoy peace, liberty and freedom but condemn the dropping of the atomic bombs would not exist because their fathers or grandfathers would have died in the invasion of Japan battles .

The Supreme War Council.....was making every possible preparation to meet (an American) landing. They proceeded with that plan until the Atomic Bomb was dropped, after which they believed the United States would no longer attempt to land when it had such a superior weapon---that the United States need not land when it had such a weapon, so at that point they decided that it would be best to sue for peace.
Kantaro Suzuki
Prime Minister of Japan
April -August 1945
The following data are abstracted from the book “Downfall” “The End of the Imperial Japanese Empire” Richard B. Frank, Random House, 1999. Dennis J. Weber, October, 2006



CHAPTER 1
TOKYO BURNS--RAID OF MARCH 9-10, 1945

PG. 6 1.7 MILLION JAPANESE KIDS BETWEEN 3RD AND 6TH GRADES SENT TO RURAL AREAS BY MARCH 1945
à 15.8 SQUARE MILES OF TOKYO FLATTENED
à DAMAGE ESTIMATED AT 82% OF TOKYO
PG. 17 BEFORE MARCH 10, 1945 ONLY 1,295 DEAD FROM ALL PREVIOUS AIR RAIDS ON TOKYO
PG. 17 BETWEEN 79,600 AND 100,000 JAPANESE DIED IN ONE NIGHT ON MARCH 10, 1945
PG. 18 THE JAPANESE MILITARY CONCEALED THE MARCH 9,10 RAID ON TOKYO FROM THE JAPANESE POPULATION
à THE JAPANESE PEOPLE WERE NOT TOLD MUCH OF
WHAT WAS HAPPENING IN THE PACIFIC.
PG. 19 SIXTY OTHER JAPANESE CITIES WERE FIRE BOMBED DURING THE RUN-UP TO THE INVASION OF THE HOME ISLANDS.

CHAPTER 2 STRATEGIES OLD STRATEGIES NEW

PG. 28 ONLY INVASION, NOT BLOCKADE COULD INSURE COLLAPSE OF JAPANESE MILITARY
PG. 29 THE JAPANESE MILITARY REFUSED TO SURRENDER
à ATTU ISLAND-----------------98.8% DIED
à TARAWA ISLAND------------99.7% DIED
à MARSHALL ISLANDS---- 98.5% DIED
à KWAJALEIN ISLAND-------98.4% DIED
à SAIPAN ISLAND--------------97%
10,000 JAPANESE CIVILIANS (50% OF POPULATION) REFUSED
INTERNMENT AND DIED ON SAIPAN
JAPANESE MILITARY CONVINCED CIVILIANS THAT “MORE HONORABLE TO TAKE THEIR OWN LIVES”
PG. 30 JAPANESE HOME ARMY IN SEPT. 1944 WAS 3.5 MILLION MEN.
ONE USA SOLDIER DIED FOR EVERY 7 JAPANESE. COULD COST 500,000 KIA AMERICANS. 420,000 KIA IN ALL OF WWII!!
WOUNDED TO KIA RATIO WAS 4 TO 1.
PG. 31 BRITISH FORCES-- 3 TO 5 DIVISIONS PLUS 20 SQUADRONS OF LANCASTER BOMBERS: BUT, NONE BEFORE SPRING 1946.
NO HELP FROM CHINA WAS EXPECTED
RUSSIA FOUGHT JAPANESE IN MANCHURIA: NO HELP UNTIL JAPAN DEFEATED: RUSSIA WANTED NORTH JAPANESE ISLAND FOR WARM WATER SEA PORT.
PG. 33 NO ACTION FROM SPRING 1945 ( OKINAWA ) UNTIL NOVEMBER 1945 INVASION OF KYUSHU AND THEN SPRING 1946 INVASION OF BIG ISLAND, HONSHU IN 1946.
à MOVING TROOPS FROM EUROPE: EFFECT OF POINT
SYSTEM ON TROOP STRENGTH.
PG. 35 UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER MUST COME FROM DECISIVE DEFEAT: UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER FOREIGN TO JAPANESE NATURE. DEFINITION OF UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER MUST BE ACCEPTABLE TO JAPANESE MILITARY OR COMPLETE ANNIHILATION WILL BE REQUIRED.

CHAPTER 3, 4 & 5 ZEPPELINS TO B-29s
LeMAY TAKES COMMAND
FIRE & MUD
PG. 48 BOMBING IN EUROPE MOST SUCCESSFUL TO STOP WAR EFFORT WHEN TRANSPORTATION, RAILROADS, HIGHWAYS, ETC. WERE DESTROYED.
PG. 49 VERY LITTLE WAS KNOWN ABOUT LOCATION OF WAR PRODUCTION FACTORIES IN JAPAN
DESTROYING WAR PRODUCTION USING INCENDIARIES ALSO KILLED A LOT OF CIVILIANS. OFTEN, WAR PRODUCTION WAS IN CIVILIAN HOMES.
PG. 56 THE MARCH 10,1945 FIRE BOMB RAID ON TOKYO PROVED MOST EFFECTIVE. 15.8 SQUARE MILE OF TOKYO BURNED OUT
PG. 68 OKINAWA WAS A HOME ISLAND STATE. JAPANESE LOSSES WERE 76,000. AMERICAN LOSSES WERE 72,358!! ALMOST 1 TO 1!! IF HOME ISLAND INVASION LOSSES CAUSED 1 TO 1 USA LOSSES: THE KIA WOULD BE TREMENDOUS IN INVASION.
PG. 78 JAPAN HAD RUDIMENTARY RAIL SYSTEM AND PRACTICALLY NO GOOD ROAD SYSTEM BETWEEN THE HOME ISLANDS. INVASION WOULD HAVE CAUSED A DISASTER IN FOOD DISTRIBUTION AND AN ESTIMATED 10 MILLION DEATHS BY STARVATION IN THE YEAR AFTER THE INVASION.

CHAPTER 6 THE FUNDAMENTAL POLICY

PG. 83 PHILIPPINES-- JAPANESE ARMY ON LUZON WAS STILL ABLE TO FIGHT: JAPAN HAD THOUSANDS OF PLANES AND MEN TO FLY THEM FOR KAMIKAZE ATTACKS
PG. 83 JANUARY 1945: THE JAPANESE ARMY WAS LARGE AND FORMIDABLE . JAPANESE STRATEGY WAS TO MAKE INVASION OF HOME ISLANDS NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE DEFEAT; EVEN COMPLETE DESTRUCTION OF CIVILIAN POPULATION.
PG. 53 JANUARY 1945: THERE WERE ONLY 12 DIVISIONS IN ALL OF JAPAN HOME ISLANDS
PG. 86 THE USA SUCCESS IN OKINAWA FORCED JAPANESE TO HEAVILY REINFORCE KYUSHU.
STARTING IN FEB. 1945:
à FEB. 1945: INCREASING TO 60 DIVISIONS PLUS
22 COSTAL DIVISIONS PLUS 2 ARMORED DIVISIONS
PLUS 34 BRIGADES
à TOTAL INCREASE WAS 1.5 MILLION MEN FOR DEFENSE
à GRAND TOTAL WAS 2.9 MILLION MEN, 292,000 HORSES,
27,500 MOTOR VEHICLES
à THE JAPANESE PLAN WAS CALLED KETSU-GO (DECISIVE
OPERATION)
(A) JAPANESE FIGHTING ARMY
(B) SUICIDE TACTICS BY LAND, SEA AND AIR
(C) ALL CIVILIANS REGARDLESS OF SEX WERE TO BE
USED TO FIGHT INVASION. (IMPERIAL ARMY “THERE
ARE NO CIVILIANS IN JAPAN”
(D) GUERILLA WAR IF JAPANESE POSITIONS LOST
PG. 83 ALL FORCES ON KYUSHU WERE IN PLACE BY EARLY JUNE OF 1945
IMPERIAL WAR JOURNAL: “ …….NO HOPE OF SUCCESS…COURSE IS FOR JAPAN’S 72 MILLION PEOPLE TO SACRIFICE THEIR LIVES…..MAKE ENEMY LOSE WILL TO FIGHT……WE WILL FALL INTO STATE OF RUIN
PG. 90 EMPEROR: DEFEAT: THRONE MAY BE PRESERVED :COMMUNIST REVOLUTION: THRONE MIGHT PERISH
PG. 95 JAPAN FIGHT TO FINISH AND CHOOSE EXTINCTION BEFORE SURRENDER….(JUNE 6) EVEN TO LAST MAN, WOMAN, CHILD
ANY NEGOTIATED PEACE MUST INCLUDE: JAPANESE CONQUERED TERRITORY IN JAPANESE HANDS TILL FREEDOM
PG. 98 THERE WILL BE DISARMAMENT BUT NO OCCUPATION
PG. 102 ANY NEGOTIATED PEACE WAS TO BEGIN WITH RUSSIA, NOT THE USA. RUSSIA AND JAPAN HAD A NON-AGGRESSION PACT STILL IN PLACE.

CHAPTER 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12

PG. 203 “MAGIC” WAS DIPLOMATIC CODE BREAKING. JAPANESE IN BERLIN GAVE USA HITLER’S WAR PLANS BECAUSE WE COULD READ JAPANESE CODE MESSAGES
PG. 108 TOTAL OF 13 DIPLOMATIC MESSAGES AFFIRMED THAT, NOT MATTER HOW DESPERATE THE SITUATION, JAPAN INTENDED TO FIGHT TO THE BITTER END. THE “MAGIC” DIPLOMATIC SUMMARY PUBLISHED PLANS FOR REGIONAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES DESIGNED FOR CONTINUED RESISTANCE FROM FRAGMENTED JAPAN AND PREPARATION TO INDUCT BOYS AS YOUNG AS 14 AND UP AMONG JAPANESE COLONISTS IN CHINA!!
THERE WERE SOME “PEACE FEELERS” BUT NONE THAT HAD OFFICIAL BACKING. “ We have received no peace offer from the Japanese Government, either through official or unofficial channels. Conversations relating to peace have been reported to the Department from various parts of the world, but in no case has an approach been made to this (USA) government, directly or indirectly, by a person who could establish his authority to speak for the Japanese Government. And in no case has an offer to surrender been made. In no case has this government been presented with a statement purporting to define the basis upon which the Japanese government would be prepared t conclude peace…. The nature of the purported “peace feelers” must be clear to everyone. They are the usual moves in the conduct of psychological warfare by a defeated enemy. No thinking American, recalling Pearl Harbor, Wake, Manila, Japanese ruthless aggression elsewhere, will give then credence. Japanese militarism must and will be crushed… the policy of this government has been is, and will be unconditional surrender.
PG. 126 THE “POINT SYSTEM” ALLOWED INDIVIDUAL USA SOLDIERS TO RETURN HOME. SOME UNITS HAD ONLY THE COMMANDING OFFICER LEFT!! ALL OTHERS HAD RETURNED HOME.
PG. 126 ABSOLUTELY IMPOSSIBLE TO MOVE AND RETRAIN TROOPS FROM EUROPE TO ASIA FOR INVASION. GERMAN TACTICS WERE DIFFERENT FROM JAPANESE TACTICS. “THE CAPITULATION ON AUGUST 14, 1945 SAVED OUR NECKS!!
PG. 130 JULY 1945: MANILA HAD: LABOR FORCE OF 300,000; 5 MILLION TONS OF SUPPLIES; 37,500 HOSPITAL BEDS; ALL FOR THE INVASION OF JAPAN.
PG. 133 A WIDELY QUOTED ESTIMATE THAT BETWEEN 500,000 AND ONE MILLION AMERICANS WOULD DIE BY THE END OF THE WAR. IWO JIMA AND OKINAWA WERE A CLUE TO KNOW THE WAR WOULD PROGRESS
PG. 135 SUCCESS NEEDS 3 USA DIVISIONS FOR EVERY ONE JAP DIVISION.
MAY 1945, USA THOUGHT THAT 9 USA DIVISIONS WOULD FACE 3 JAPANESE DIVISIONS---THIS WAS A MISTAKE--JAPAN HAD 50 DIVISIONS!!!
PG. 136 BUT, BY JUNE 26,1945 THE ESTIMATE WAS 8 JAPANESE DIVISIONS AND 350,000 JAPANESE SOLDIERS
THE NOVEMBER, 1945 INVASION, OLYMPIC, PREDICTED 514,072 CASUALTIES WITH 174,556 KIA.
PG. 137 PROJECTED USA CASUALTIES FOR OLYMPIC PLUS CORONET WAS 1,202,005 TOTAL INCLUDING 314,619 KILLED IN ACTION. THESE NUMBERS ARE ONLY FOR GROUND FORCES LANDING ON KYUSHU AND DO NOT INCLUDE ANY NAVY, AIR FORCE OR SUNKEN TROOP SHIP TRANSPORTS FROM EUROPE!!
PG. 142 TOTAL USA ASSAULT TROOPS WAS PLANNED AT 76,700 MEN ON THE GROUND.
PG. 133 QUOTED: 500,000 TO 1 MILLION AMERICANS WOULD DIE.
PG. 146 TRUMAN NEVER GIVEN UNAMBIGUOUS ESTIMATE OF NUMBER OF CASUALTIES FOR OLYMPIC, THE INVASION OF KYUSHU ALONE.
PG. 161 ALL ALLIED POW WOULD BE KILLED IF INVASION STARTED
PG. 163 FROM 1931 TO 1945: 17,222,500 CIVILIANS MURDERED.
EACH MONTH OF WAR GAVE BETWEEN 100,000 AND 250,000 CIVILIAN DEATHS. THE ATOM BOMBS AVOIDED ALL THESE ADDITIONAL DEATHS
PG. 177 NOVEMBER INVASION WOULD FACE 14 FULLY EQUIPPED JAPANESE DIVISIONS ON THE BEACHES, BUT WE EXPECTED ONLY THREE.
PG. 184 SUICIDE PLANES TO HIT ALLIED TROOP TRANSPORTS. AT WAR’S END JAPAN HAD 4,800 PLANES (ARMY) AND 5,900 PLANES (NAVY). NOT ALL KAMIKAZE.
PG. 186 ALLIED ESTIMATE WAS 5,350 KAMIKAZE PLANES; POSTWAR DATA SHOWED 7,500 KAMIKAZE PLANES AVAILABLE
PG. 188 ALL STUDENTS ABOVE GRADE 6 WERE MOBILIZED.
PG. 188 SCHOOL GIRL ISSUED AN AWL TO USE TO KILL AMERICANS
PG. 188 NO UNIFORMS ISSUED TO CIVILIANS
PG. 188 INTERCEPTED JAPANESE RADIO MESSAGES SAID THERE WERE “NO CIVILIANS IN JAPAN”. COMPLETE DESTRUCTION OF CIVILIANS WOULD BE NECESSARY.
PG. 189 THE CIVILIAN MOBILIZATION CREATED A HUGE POOL OF MEN AND WOMEN TO PERFORM…. ULTIMATELY COMBAT JOBS. ADDING TENS OF MILLIONS TO STRENGTH OF GROUND COMBAT UNITS AND GUARANTEEING HUGE CIVILIAN CAUSALITIES. JAPAN MILITARY MASTERS WILLFULLY CONSIGNED HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF JAPANESE COUNTRY MEN TO DEATH. MOREOVER, BY DELIBERATELY ELIMINATING ANY DISTINCTION BETWEEN COMBATANTS AND NON-COMBATANTS, THEY WOULD COMPEL AMERICANS TO TREAT ALL JAPANESE AS COMBATANTS OR FAIL TO DO SO AT THEIR PERIL, IT WAS A RECIPE FOR EXTINCTION!!!!!
PG. 191 TOTAL JAPANESE COMMITTED TROOPS ON KYUSHU WAS AT LEAST 500,000 TROOPS. USA WAS TO USE 380,000 TROOPS FOR INVASION OF KYUSHU. THE USA WOULD BE AT A DISADVANTAGE.
PG. 194 IF A MERE 10% FATALITY RATE IS ASSUMED FOR JAPANESE FORCES, THE TOTAL COMES TO 580,000 TO 630,000 FOR INVASION OF KYUSHU ALONE!!
PG. 196 But a military yardstick is not the critical historical measurement of Ketsu-Go versus Olympic. The Japanese comprehended astutely that they need not repulse Olympic to attain their overarching political objective: to find the American threshold in casualties that would induce American policy makers to parley for terms to the taste of Japanese militarists. Moreover, they correctly perceived that this threshold comprised not just the raw number of losses in Olympic but also the implications those casualties carried for the rest of the war. The Japanese did not have to reach the ultimate American threshold; they needed only to convince U.S. policy makers and the public that the bloodletting on Kyushu foretold an unbearable ultimate cost.
PG. 196 The American tolerance for casualties was never thus tested, so it cannot be certified, but there are several benchmarks form which it can to judged. First, with total battle death for the war at 292,751, each additional 29,275 dead increased the war’s cost by 10 percent. Moreover, and perhaps more telling, the highest death total for any one month of the war---20,325 in March 1945--could have been exceeded easily in the first thirty days of Olympic. Because battle casualties fell in great disproportion on combat troops, battle casualties ashore of only 92,500--a number well within Japanese capabilities --would double the losses for the entire war among the assault divisions. This carried dire implication for combat effectiveness and morale. Any soldier or Marine infantryman slated for Olympic who believed the atomic bomb saved them from death or wounds had solid grounds for this belief. The other men earmarked for Olympic, whatever their job, would have become unwilling participants in a gigantic and deadly game of kamikaze roulette where random chance determined who lived and who died. Marshall, Macarthur, Truman recoiled from such casualties. Japanese field commanders had a sound grasp of Ketsu-Go’s purely military prospects. Major General Masakazu Amano, Chief of Operations, Imperial General Headquarters after the war: “We were absolutely sure of victory. It was the first and the only battle in which the main strength of the air, land and sea forces were to be joined. The geographical advantages of the homeland were to be utilized to the highest degree, the enemy (USA) was to be crushed, and we were confident that the battle would prove to be the turning point in political maneuvering. Lieutenant General Seizo Arisue, explained after the war, “ If we could defeat the enemy in Kyushu or inflict tremendous losses, forcing him to realize the strong fighting spirit of the Japanese Army and people, it would be possible, we hoped, to bring about the termination of hostilities on comparatively favorable terms. I.E. NO UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER. In the debate over the end of the Pacific conflict, Americans customarily relate the invasion of the Home Islands to the decision to use nuclear weapons to halt the war. This perspective, however, misses the role the invasion played in continuing the war. The leaders of the Imperial Army eld the reasonable conviction that American morale could be broken in an invasion. Ending the war thus demanded that the Imperial Army’s faith in Ketsu-Go must be shattered. That faith was shattered by the atomic bombs.
CHAPTER 13
PG. 216 ULTRA--MILITARY CODE BREAKING INTELLIGENCE.
PG. 216 “AUTHORITY OF EMPEROR ONLY FORCE TO ENSURING SURRENDER OF ALL JAPANESE FORCES. TWO MILLION JAPANESE MILITARY SCATTERED ACROSS ASIA AND PACIFIC.
PG. 230 TOGO’S JULY 21, 1945 REPLY: With regard to unconditional surrender we are unable to consent to it under any circumstances whatever. Even if the war drags on and it becomes clear that it will take much more than bloodshed, the whole country as one man will pit itself against the enemy in accordance with the Imperial Will so long as the enemy demands unconditional surrender. It is in order to avoid such a state of affairs that we are seeking a peace, which is not so-called unconditional surrender, through the good offices of Russia…. Therefore, it is not only impossible for us to request the Russians to lend their good offices in obtaining a peace without condition, but it would also be both disadvantageous and impossible, from the standpoint of foreign and domestic considerations, to make an immediate declaration of specific terms.

CHAPTER 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21
HIROSHIMA BOMB KILLED 43,000 SOLDIERS PLUS 290,000 CIVILIANS
ATOMIC BOMBS: “LITTLE BOY” WAS A PLUTONIUM BOMB; “FAT MAN” WAS A URANIUM BOMB.
PG. 292 THE JAPANESE ARMY MINISTER SAID; “ONE ATOMIC BOMB COULD DESTROY 6 SQUARE MILES, WHICH WAS EQUIVALENT TO 2000 B-29 S EACH WITH 300 CONVENTIONAL BOMBS OF 500 POUNDS EACH….THE AMERICANS APPEARED TO HAVE ONE HUNDRED ATOMIC BOMBS…WHILE THEY COULD DROP THREE PER DAY. THE NEXT TARGET MIGHT WELL BE TOKYO!!
IN REALITY, WE, AMERICANS HAD ONLY TWO OPERATIONALLY
READY BOMBS! OTHERS WERE BEING BUILT.
PG. 295 AUGUST 10, 1945; THE EMPEROR’S STATEMENT; I have given serious thought to the situation prevailing at home and abroad and have concluded that continuing the war can only mean destruction for the nation and prolongation of bloodshed and cruelty in the world. I cannot bear to see my innocent people suffer any longer. Ending the war is the only way to restore world peace and to relieve the nation from the terrible distress with which it is burdened. I was told by those advocating a continuation of hostilities that by June new divisions would be placed in fortified positions at Jujukuri-hama ( the beaches east of Tokyo) so that they would be ready for the invader when he sought to land. It is now August and the fortifications still have not been completed. Even the equipment for the divisions which are to fight there is insufficient and reportedly will not be adequate until after the middle of September. Furthermore, the promised increase in the production of aircraft has not progressed accordance with expectations. There are those who say that the key to national survival lies in a decisive battle in the homeland. The experiences of the past however, show that there has always been a discrepancy between plans and performance. I do not believe that the discrepancy is the case of Kujukuri can be rectified. Since this is the shape of things, how can we repel the invaders?? (At about this point, he also made specific reference to the greatly increased destructiveness of the atomic bomb). It goes without saying that it is unbearable for me to see the brave and loyal fighting men of Japan disarmed. It is equally unbearable that others who have rendered me devoted service should now be punished as instigators of the war. Nevertheless, the time has come when we must bear the unbearable…… I swallow my own tears and give my sanction to the proposal to accept the Allied proclamation on the basis outlined by the Foreign Minister.
PG. 302 TRUMAN KNEW THAT USA HAD ONLY TWO BOMBS, THAT MORE WERE BEING BUILT. ONLY TWO BOMBS WERE ON TINIAN ISLAND, READY TO BE DROPPED.
PG. 320 ON AUGUST 15, THE EMPEROR BROADCAST TO THE JAPANESE PEOPLE THE DECISION TO ACCEPT UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER:
PG. 321 IN A HOSPITAL IN HIROSHIMA, DR. HACHIYA STOOD STUNNED: AT FIRST PEOPLE WHISPERED, THEN BEGAN TO SHOUT!!
“ONLY A COWARD WOULD BACK OUT NOW!”
“THERE IS A LIMIT TO DECEIVING US!”
“I WOULD RATHER DIE THAN BE DEFEATED”
“WHAT HAVE WE BEEN SUFFERING FOR!!?
“THOSE WHO DIED CANNOT GO TO HEAVEN IN PEACE NOW”!
THE HOSPITAL SUDDENLY BECAME AN UPROAR……MANY WHO HAD BEEN STRONG ADVOCATES OF PEACE AND OTHERS WHO HAD LOST THEIR TASTE FOR WAR WERE NOW SHOUTING FOR THE WAR TO CONTINUE!! THE ONE WORD-- SURRENDER-- HAD PRODUCED A GREATER SHOCK THAN THE ATOMIC BOMBING OF OUR CITY
SURRENDER--à THE HIROSHIMA AND NAGASAKI BOMBS CONVINCED THE JAPANESE MILITARY THAT THE AMERICANS DID NOT NEED TO INVADE JAPAN. COMPLETE DESTRUCTION AND DEATH COULD BE ACCOMPLISHED WITHOUT INVASION.
IF NO INVASION THEN KETSU-GO WAS USELESS AND NO HONORABLE DEATH
POSSIBLE.
BECAUSE TOKYO WAS NOT ATOM BOMBED, THE EMPEROR WAS STILL ALIVE
EMPEROR’S DECLARATION OF SURRENDER WAS OBEYED BY ALL JAPANESE FORCES EVERYWHERE. (WITH SOME GRUMBLING)
PG. 322 AFTER THE WAR, AND AFTER THE COLLAPSE OF THE SOVIET UNION, IT BECAME KNOWN THAT STALIN’S AMBITIONS INCLUDED MANCHURIA, KOREA, AND ALSO PARTS OF THE JAPANESE HOME ISLANDS. THE ATOMIC BOMBS MAY WELL HAVE AVOIDED A CONFRONTATION BETWEEN THE USSR AND THE ALLIES IN THE FAR EAST. IF THE BOMBS HAD NOT BEEN DROPPED, THE WORLD’S MAP WOULD BE FAR DIFFERENT THAN WHAT WE SEE TODAY.
THE WAR WAS OVER
PG. 360 “FINALLY, THE DEATHS ACTUALLY INCURRED IN ENDING THE WAR WERE NOT GRATUITOUS . AMERICAN GOALS, ALL DURING THE WAR, WERE NOT SIMPLY VICTORY BUT PEACE. HAD AMERICAN LEADERS IN 1945 BEEN ASSURED THAT JAPAN AND THE UNITED STATES WOULD PASS TWO GENERATIONS IN TRANQUILITY AND STILL LOOK FORWARD WITH NO PROSPECT OF FUTURE CONFLICT, THEY WOULD HAVE BELIEVED THEIR HARD CHOICES HAD BEEN VINDICATED ---AND SO SHOULD WE.